Pennsylvania State, Crypto Miner Sued for Polluting Environment
In a groundbreaking legal action, the state of Pennsylvania finds itself in the crosshairs over allegations of failing to shield its inhabitants from the adverse effects of cryptocurrency mining. Save Carbon County, an environmental advocacy group, has initiated legal proceedings against Stronghold Digital Mining, accusing the firm of utilizing waste coal and tires to power its crypto mining activities, thereby significantly harming the environment.
The Heart of the Matter
The crux of the lawsuit lies in the assertion that Stronghold’s operations in northeastern Pennsylvania, notably its energy-guzzling Bitcoin proof-of-work processes, have inflicted considerable environmental damage. This case marks an unprecedented instance where the state has been implicated for contravening a constitutional mandate that ensures the public’s right to a pristine environment, as highlighted by Aaron Freiwald, the legal representative of the NGO.
Stronghold Digital Mining is reportedly responsible for emitting an astonishing six million tons of carbon dioxide annually. Critics argue that Pennsylvania’s lack of action against crypto mining or its failure to promote alternative, less energy-intensive verification methods, such as “proof of stake,” underscores a glaring oversight.
Legal Crypto and Environmental Challenges
Save Carbon County’s legal challenge is multifaceted, targeting Stronghold for allegedly creating a public nuisance, incurring public liability, and acting negligently. The group seeks reparation for the pollution linked to crypto mining and the resultant ecological damage.
In defense, a spokesperson from Stronghold contends that the company’s operations have contributed positively to the environment by cleaning up millions of tons of waste coal and rejuvenating over 1,050 acres of land, transforming them into community spaces.
From Burning Tires to Greener Ways
Since acquiring Panther Creek in 2021 to facilitate cryptocurrency generation, Stronghold has faced at least seven environmental violations related to unauthorized air pollution, as per the Department of Environmental Protection. The company’s method of incorporating tire burning into its energy production has been particularly contentious, raising concerns about the emission of harmful pollutants.
Experts like Russell Zerbo of the Clean Air Council and Lena Klaaßen of the Crypto Carbon Ratings Institute emphasize the necessity for more sustainable practices and transparency in the cryptocurrency mining sector, especially given the urgent
Read More
Pennsylvania State, Crypto Miner Sued for Polluting Environment
In a groundbreaking legal action, the state of Pennsylvania finds itself in the crosshairs over allegations of failing to shield its inhabitants from the adverse effects of cryptocurrency mining. Save Carbon County, an environmental advocacy group, has initiated legal proceedings against Stronghold Digital Mining, accusing the firm of utilizing waste coal and tires to power its crypto mining activities, thereby significantly harming the environment.
The Heart of the Matter
The crux of the lawsuit lies in the assertion that Stronghold’s operations in northeastern Pennsylvania, notably its energy-guzzling Bitcoin proof-of-work processes, have inflicted considerable environmental damage. This case marks an unprecedented instance where the state has been implicated for contravening a constitutional mandate that ensures the public’s right to a pristine environment, as highlighted by Aaron Freiwald, the legal representative of the NGO.
Stronghold Digital Mining is reportedly responsible for emitting an astonishing six million tons of carbon dioxide annually. Critics argue that Pennsylvania’s lack of action against crypto mining or its failure to promote alternative, less energy-intensive verification methods, such as “proof of stake,” underscores a glaring oversight.
Legal Crypto and Environmental Challenges
Save Carbon County’s legal challenge is multifaceted, targeting Stronghold for allegedly creating a public nuisance, incurring public liability, and acting negligently. The group seeks reparation for the pollution linked to crypto mining and the resultant ecological damage.
In defense, a spokesperson from Stronghold contends that the company’s operations have contributed positively to the environment by cleaning up millions of tons of waste coal and rejuvenating over 1,050 acres of land, transforming them into community spaces.
From Burning Tires to Greener Ways
Since acquiring Panther Creek in 2021 to facilitate cryptocurrency generation, Stronghold has faced at least seven environmental violations related to unauthorized air pollution, as per the Department of Environmental Protection. The company’s method of incorporating tire burning into its energy production has been particularly contentious, raising concerns about the emission of harmful pollutants.
Experts like Russell Zerbo of the Clean Air Council and Lena Klaaßen of the Crypto Carbon Ratings Institute emphasize the necessity for more sustainable practices and transparency in the cryptocurrency mining sector, especially given the urgent
Read More