On Thursday, Federal Judge William Alsup told the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to cancel its earlier orders from Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) that told agencies to “promptly determine” whether certain employees should stay or be fired.

The judge didn’t just stop the terminations—he called the entire process illegal and said it should have never happened in the first place.

The OPM had sent out a January 20 memo and a February 14 internal email, both pushing agencies to decide the fate of probationary employees. Alsup wasn’t having it. He ordered OPM to notify the Department of Defense that those terminations were invalid—and he wants this done before the planned firings happen. He also ordered a hearing, where acting OPM Director Charles Ezell will have to testify. No date has been set yet.

Judge: OPM had no right to order mass firings

Alsup made it clear that OPM had no legal authority to force these agencies to fire employees. “The Office of Personnel Management does not have any authority whatsoever under any statute in the history of the universe to hire and fire employees within another agency,” he said. “It can hire its own employees, yes. Can fire them. But it cannot order or direct some other agency to do so.”

He also called probationary workers “the lifeblood of our government”—people who enter at lower levels and move up over time. The government, he said, depends on them to keep things running.

The lawsuit against DOGE came from unions, including the American Federation of Labor, arguing that Musk’s agency was violating the Privacy Act and the Administrative Procedure Act by trying to access Labor Department data. Judge John Bates of Washington, D.C., ordered at least one DOGE official to testify and hand over documents, marking the first time someone inside D.O.G.E has been legally forced to answer questions under oath from an outside attorney.

Bates called D.O.G.E “opaque”, meaning the agency operates with little transparency. The ruling could reveal how DOGE really functions inside the federal system and what data it has access to.

DOGE under fire for secrecy and overreach

Bates also approved four depositions with staffers at the Department of Health and Human Services, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Labor Department, and D.O.G.E. The unions pushing the case want proof that D.O.G.E is illegally accessing federal records. The judge ruled that these depositions should be limited to eight hours total, but it’s unclear if the public will ever see them.

The unions that filed the lawsuit are seeking to block DOGE from accessing Labor Department data, arguing that access to such sensitive information systems would violate the Privacy Act and the Administrative Procedure Act.

Another case against DOGE, filed by the Center for Biological Diversity, argues that the agency is dodging federal transparency laws. This group, which focuses on protecting the environment, says the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has refused to release information on D.O.G.E’s actions, despite Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) rules requiring federal agencies to disclose records upon request.

D.O.G.E has faced over 20 lawsuits, but this is the first one focused entirely on transparency laws. The Center for Biological Diversity suit claims that because DOGE is deliberately moving quickly to cut government funding and staff, and its efforts will have effects on the environment (the Environmental Protection Agency has said D.O.G.E helped it make significant cuts, for instance), it’s urgent to uncover more details about how D.O.G.E operates.

The FOIA lawsuit argues that the government should not be allowed to make drastic staffing cuts in secrecy. “FOIA was designed to ensure that monumental and consequential undertakings such as this could not take place without transparency,” the lawsuit says. It also warns that D.O.G.E’s staffing cuts could “harm, undermine, or negate” federal climate protections, land management, and public health regulations.

Government argues it was just ‘guidance’

There was a major dispute over whether OPM’s mid-February calls to agencies were actual orders or just “requests”. Alsup wasn’t convinced. He pointed out that when something happens at the same time across multiple agencies, it sounds more like an order than mere “guidance.”

“Something aberrational happens, not just in one agency, but all across the government, in many agencies on the same day, the same thing,” Alsup said. “Doesn’t that sound like to you that somebody ordered it to happen, as opposed to, ‘Oh, we just got guidance’?”

Assistant U.S. Attorney Kelsey Helland, the government’s lawyer, disagreed. “An order is not usually phrased as a request,” she argued. “Asking is not ordering to do something.”

She suggested that impacted employees should take their cases to the Office of Special Counsel or the Merit Systems Protection Board instead of seeking a restraining order.

Danielle Leonard, an attorney for the unions, pushed back. “Are they really contending to this court that all of these federal employees are lying, Your Honor?” she asked. “That’s what counsel is saying. I don’t think it’s credible.”

Cryptopolitan Academy: Tired of market swings? Learn how DeFi can help you build steady passive income. Register Now

Jio Financial Services shares are on a downward trajectory shedding more than 3% on Friday. JIOFIN fell to a low of 214.36 and is attracting bearish sentiments in the charts. The stock has plummeted close to 28% year-to-date and traders who took an entry position in 2025 are experiencing losses. Sensex opened Friday’s bell in the red crashing by 900 points while Nifty 50 fell by over 270 points.

Also Read: What’s Happening With Tesla (TSLA) Stock?

The markets have been on a relentless dip since October as foreign institutional investors (FII) exited with a load of more than $1.2 billion. This put the markets under pressure as the daily sell-off put the index into a slow crash mode. Jio Financial Services shares have now reached its launch price of August 2023 and are back to square one in the charts.

Also Read: Nvidia (NVDA) Stock Falls 8% Following Poor Q1 2025 Outlook

Buy the Dip on Jio Financial Shares?

The stock market could have a longer downturn and a quick recovery from here looks impossible. FIIs heavily invest in the Chinese stock market as the prices are much lower. Taking an entry position now in Chinese sectors could pay off massively when the index surges. Therefore, Jio Financial Services shares are yet to bottom out and could head south further in the indices.

Also Read: Ripple XRP: Can Price Still Reach $4 This Altcoin Season?

It is advised to keep money in hand and not take an entry position at this moment. The best shot to enter JIOFIN could be when the stock falls below the Rs 200 mark and trades at Rs 170 to 190. Going long from this price point could be beneficial as Jio Financial Services shares have a solid background and might become a multi-bagger in the long term.

Retail traders are under the spotlight as their investments have tanked for the first time since the 2020 COVID-19 fall. The bull market has come to an end paving the way for the bearish grips. JIOFIN might now take longer to recover as the road to its ATH is high.