Top 100 Coins
Trending Cryptos
Performance
Recently Listed
Gainers
All Categories
All Time High
Blockchains
Global Market Data
Ecosystems
Research
Rewards
Heatmaps
Drop Hunting
Alerts
Converter
Widgets
Market Data API
Futures and Options
Affiliate Program
SEC’s Hester Peirce Calls for Crypto Sandbox, But Wormhole’s Legal Chief Pushes Back
Share:
SEC’s Peirce Renews Call for Crypto Sandbox
SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce has renewed her call for a regulatory sandbox for the crypto industry. One of the most pro-innovation voices at the commission, Peirce has long argued for lighter frameworks to allow blockchain startups to build products without immediate regulatory fallout.
Amid growing interest in tokenized securities and decentralized infrastructure, Peirce suggested a sandbox could help provide a bridge between innovation and compliance.
Wormhole’s Cathy Yoon: Sandboxes Present Severe Risks
Cathy Yoon, General Counsel at Wormhole Foundation, greeted Peirce’s remarks with qualified agreement. While she recognized the necessity to eliminate regulatory obstacles for new crypto projects, she rang alarm bells on the sandbox concept.
“The infrastructure that would be needed to support tokenized securities is still relatively underdeveloped and expensive to put in place,” said Yoon, echoing Peirce’s call for some exemptions to be useful.
But she scoffed at the idea of a regulatory sandbox as the right vehicle.
Biased Enforcement a Core Concern
Yoon warned that regulatory sandboxes, while valuable in theory, could turn into arbitrary decision-making and regulatory bias.
“A sandbox is only as good as the flexibility and support a regulator offers,” she said. “There is also a danger that regulators will be too nice to sandbox participants, leading to biased supervision or even weaker enforcement further down the road.”
These are reflective of broader industry skepticism on whether regulators can run sandboxes without undermining fair competition or creating confusion on compliance expectations.
An Alternative: Temporary Exemptions
Rather than pursuing Peirce’s sandbox concept, Yoon suggested an alternative—temporary regulatory exemptions. These would allow companies to operate in live environments within a predetermined timeframe, while still being subject to broader SEC supervision.
She argued this structure would foster innovation without compromising regulatory integrity.
The Way Forward
As the SEC continues to rebalance its strategy towards digital assets, voices like Peirce’s and Yoon’s call out the balance between innovation and oversight. Whether through sandboxes or exemptions from frameworks, the future of crypto regulation could depend on how these recommendations are translated into actionable policy.
In This News
Coins
Share:
In This News
Coins
Share:
Read More
Urgent Warning: Japan’s Crippling Crypto Tax Reform Risks Global Irrelevance
Crypto Market Brace for Volatility Ahead of Today’s U.S. CPI Data Release – What to Expect
SEC’s Hester Peirce Calls for Crypto Sandbox, But Wormhole’s Legal Chief Pushes Back
Share:
SEC’s Peirce Renews Call for Crypto Sandbox
SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce has renewed her call for a regulatory sandbox for the crypto industry. One of the most pro-innovation voices at the commission, Peirce has long argued for lighter frameworks to allow blockchain startups to build products without immediate regulatory fallout.
Amid growing interest in tokenized securities and decentralized infrastructure, Peirce suggested a sandbox could help provide a bridge between innovation and compliance.
Wormhole’s Cathy Yoon: Sandboxes Present Severe Risks
Cathy Yoon, General Counsel at Wormhole Foundation, greeted Peirce’s remarks with qualified agreement. While she recognized the necessity to eliminate regulatory obstacles for new crypto projects, she rang alarm bells on the sandbox concept.
“The infrastructure that would be needed to support tokenized securities is still relatively underdeveloped and expensive to put in place,” said Yoon, echoing Peirce’s call for some exemptions to be useful.
But she scoffed at the idea of a regulatory sandbox as the right vehicle.
Biased Enforcement a Core Concern
Yoon warned that regulatory sandboxes, while valuable in theory, could turn into arbitrary decision-making and regulatory bias.
“A sandbox is only as good as the flexibility and support a regulator offers,” she said. “There is also a danger that regulators will be too nice to sandbox participants, leading to biased supervision or even weaker enforcement further down the road.”
These are reflective of broader industry skepticism on whether regulators can run sandboxes without undermining fair competition or creating confusion on compliance expectations.
An Alternative: Temporary Exemptions
Rather than pursuing Peirce’s sandbox concept, Yoon suggested an alternative—temporary regulatory exemptions. These would allow companies to operate in live environments within a predetermined timeframe, while still being subject to broader SEC supervision.
She argued this structure would foster innovation without compromising regulatory integrity.
The Way Forward
As the SEC continues to rebalance its strategy towards digital assets, voices like Peirce’s and Yoon’s call out the balance between innovation and oversight. Whether through sandboxes or exemptions from frameworks, the future of crypto regulation could depend on how these recommendations are translated into actionable policy.
In This News
Coins
Share:
In This News
Coins
Share:
Read More
Urgent Warning: Japan’s Crippling Crypto Tax Reform Risks Global Irrelevance