Mark Zuckerberg told President Trump the week of August 17 that a FINRA-style national AI regulator that tests frontier models would be flawed and risk ceding leadership to foreign labs, while the White House weighs that option against voluntary industry standards. Senator Bernie Sanders and Rep. Greg Casar introduced the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act in early September 2026 to outlaw systems that match or exceed human cognitive performance, freeze advanced AI development until a federal regulator sets rules and impose up to 20 years in prison for violators, raising regulatory, security and adoption risks for the AI industry and its funding.

Bearish

Predictions Markets

See what traders are focused on

View analytics →

In Brief

Zuckerberg told Trump a national AI regulator was flawed, POLITICO reported.
Sanders' rival bill would jail AI violators for up to 20 years.
The White House weighs a FINRA-style regulator against voluntary industry standards.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Senator Bernie Sanders staked out opposite ends of US AI regulation on Thursday. Zuckerberg called a national regulator flawed, while Sanders moved to ban advanced AI.

Those two positions now bracket the fight in Washington. One camp wants industry to police itself while the other wants the government to stop building.

Zuckerberg Says AI Regulation Would Hand China the Lead

Trump called Zuckerberg the week of August 17, POLITICO reported Thursday. Zuckerberg opposed a proposed watchdog modeled on the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

FINRA polices US brokerages and is funded by the firms it oversees. The AI version would test frontier models for risk before release. Google DeepMind chief Demis Hassabis popularized the idea in July.

Zuckerberg had already argued that superintelligence should reach everyone rather than a few labs.

“Any policy that slows American model releases … could add significant risk to American leadership while letting foreign models race ahead,” Zuckerberg said in August.

Sanders Sets the Bar at Human Level

Sanders and Representative Greg Casar announced the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act on Thursday. It would outlaw systems that match or exceed human cognitive performance.

That bar sits lower than the name suggests. Matching human performance would trigger the ban.

The bill would also freeze advanced AI work until a new federal regulator writes rules. Violators face up to 20 years in prison.

Sanders has pressed Congress on AI before without moving legislation.

“The future of humanity cannot be left in the hands of a handful of Big Tech oligarchs,” Sanders said in a statement.

Zuckerberg did not kill the proposal. Officials are still weighing the FINRA-style body against a voluntary industry group. Adviser David Sacks favors the lighter option and has dismissed AI safety fears as storytelling.

$META CEO Mark Zuckerberg told President Trump in a private August call that he opposed a proposal to create a national AI regulator, according to Business Insider.The White House is considering a FINRA-style body that could review and test advanced AI models for risks before… pic.twitter.com/dCNX3Lqf55
— Wall St Engine (@wallstengine) September 3, 2026