Intesa Sanpaolo Slashes BlackRock Bitcoin ETF Stake 94% as Staked Ether Holdings Triple

Italy’s largest banking group just delivered one of the most dramatic crypto portfolio pivots reported in a quarterly filing this year. Intesa Sanpaolo slashed its common-share position in BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) by 93.7% from the previous quarter, leaving only 40,723 shares, while simultaneously tripling its holdings in the iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF to 349,600 shares. The snapshot comes from the bank’s latest 13F, as detailed in the latest 13F filing, and it captures a rare inside look at how a large European institution is reshuffling crypto ETF exposures.

The reshuffling didn’t stop with spot. The underlying-share amount tied to the bank’s reported IBIT call position dropped 99.3% to just 18,000 shares. Meanwhile, a new put position equivalent to 500,000 IBIT shares appeared on the books. That put—significantly larger than the remaining spot longs—suggests a pronounced shift toward downside protection or outright bearish positioning in Bitcoin. Combined with the common-share sale, the filing points to a deliberate risk reduction in BTC-linked products during the second quarter.

A sharp rotation with a hedged posture

The 13F does not reveal the full options structure, making it impossible to calculate the bank’s net Bitcoin exposure precisely. A large put could hedge other off-balance-sheet Bitcoin risk or serve as a directional bet. Either way, the simultaneous collapse in calls and expansion of puts is not a neutral repositioning. It indicates that the bank’s options desk or treasury opted for a starkly different trade structure compared to the previous quarter.

Over the same period, the iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF became a much larger line item. The jump from 116,200 to 349,600 shares is a 201% increase, far outpacing the retreat from Bitcoin. Institutional demand for staking yield has been building, as seen with SUI’s recent surge on institutional staking news, and Intesa’s move fits that pattern. Staked ETH products offer a yield component that pure spot Bitcoin ETFs cannot, and that yield can look attractive to a bank managing net interest margin pressure in a lower-rate eurozone.

Staked ETH gets the nod while Solana fades

The filing also captured a near-complete exit from the Bitwise Solana Staking ETF. Position size fell from 2,817 shares to just seven. That might reflect profit-taking—SOL had rallied earlier in the year—or simply a reallocation to Ethereum’s larger and more liquid staking ecosystem. Either interpretation fits a broader pattern of institutions concentrating on one or two staked assets rather than scattering small bets across multiple chains.

Yet the Solana detail underscores the experimental nature of many institutional crypto allocations. Initial small positions are entered and then quickly wound down if conviction doesn’t build. The Ethereum ETF stake, now at a meaningful size, suggests a much firmer decision. For Bitcoin, the picture is almost the reverse: a core holding dismantled and replaced with a hedged structure that may be more capital-efficient under bank risk frameworks.

What the filing hides about net risk

13F filings only require disclosure of long positions, certain options, and certain other instruments, not a complete balance-sheet view. Intesa Sanpaolo may hold Bitcoin or Ether via other structures—futures, swaps, or through its asset management arms—that never appear here. The filed put could be part of a collar, a spread, or a broader volatility trade that the public cannot see. That opacity is why the market should treat the snapshot as directional but incomplete.

The timing matters too. The filing reflects positions as of June 30, a quarter marked by Bitcoin struggling below $30,000 for stretches and Ethereum staking yields remaining relatively stable. If the bank acted early in the quarter, the trades may already look very different. Still, the size of the IBIT put relative to the remaining common shares is hard to ignore. Someone inside the bank wanted a lot of Bitcoin downside protection in a hurry.

The repositioning lands in a regulatory environment where banks and crypto remain uneasy bedfellows. Banks have been lobbying hard against major US crypto legislation just days before a Senate vote, and European supervisors are still fine-tuning their own frameworks for bank crypto holdings. Intesa’s outsized shift will not escape the notice of regulators monitoring concentration and risk management practices. That visibility may be part of the calculus—showing a hedged posture is safer than carrying a large naked spot ETF book on a quarterly public filing.

The broader trend of traditional finance dipping into tokenized assets and ETFs is not slowing down. On-chain real-world assets just crossed $20 billion and institutional settlement activity is accelerating. In that context, Intesa Sanpaolo’s maneuvers are not a retreat from crypto but a reorientation—favoring yield-generating staked ETH over a static Bitcoin spot position and layering in protection when holding Bitcoin at all. Whether that trade proves prescient or panicked depends on price action that hasn’t happened yet.